A Month of Compaction
Matthew Hope
The object is the space: A depository of activities, resources and recordings
The project was initiated
by the acquisition of a large industrial waste compactor, which was
delivered by a commercial entity, downloaded and placed in a public
thoroughfare. The object—its immediate environment, its
exterior fabric, interior space, and shifting “contents”—were
subject to a month of interventions. Adjustments to the
object-environment are achieved not only by such formalities as the
temporary declaration of an “art” space (using the
interior to host works) but by offering a continuous series of
re-contextualizations of a current artistic practice into the vacuum
where waste should be.
Throughout the entire
placement period the occupation of the object was engendered by
gestures of continual feeding of the internal void through its
uncloseable entrance. Such sustenance included the temporary,
shifting and relocation of my own works and projects, but also a
facilitation of the interior space as an available zone for a range
of social, sonic, and performative activities.
The Compactor and its
accumulating contents will morph and grow. The open entrance allows
viewers and visitors to tamper with its contents, assisting in the
re-editing and arrangement of the day’s objects or events. The
physical limitations of the Compactor are set to contain and define
these works and happenings.
Clearly, I do not intend
the Compactor to function as a precipitant of some modular utopian
vision. Far from it. As the original purpose of the object was to
collect waste, it will continue to discharge this primal function, a
task-orientation signaled by its lack of customization and informal
intersection with ambient utilities. This Compactor will not become
designed or contrived so as to so disrupt this function. The only
event binding the myriad sub-events will be the final gestural of
removal. Everything will go, including the activity itself.
Threatened by its very function and its ceaseless appetite to
compress discard and dispose with.
The deliver
Meeting its appointment
for an unsuspected function with astonishingly punctuality, the
Compactor arrived exactly on time. It is now in full view, delicately
perched high on the truck’s chassis, its purpose briefly
obscured by its stark geometrical outline, which appears deceptively
streamlined, almost optimistic.
Once the truck is in
position the off-loading of the Compactor commences. This is
extremely dramatic. The drone of hydraulic motors and slow extension
of actuators that launch the container concur in an intense
mechanical gesture. The truck's engine revving at full throttle,
producing excessive exhaust gases. The Compactor is deployed in the
horizontal position but quickly rises up to an unnerving 40 degree
angle until its open end hits the floor with a punctuated bang. The
truck shunts the compactor which travels on a set of heavy, stone-age
rollers, to the desired location (where there is enough room on both
sides to permit the flow of human traffic). At the given the signal,
the truck pulls away. The Compactor sits in its final resting place.
As soon as the Compactor
lay at rest, I began to examine and reflect upon, its construction.
In contrast to the conventions of the White Cube it is the exterior
of the Compactors, rather than its insides, that are the most
polished surfaces. The thing was far cruder than I had remembered
from our first encounter in the sweltering heat of Waste Managements
toxic depot (the company from which I hired this), located in
suburban sprawl, El Cajon, near San Diego.
When visiting the yard I
was unable to view the interior of the Compactor as it was tightly
packed and backed up against a field of others. The exterior was
somewhat acceptable as a finished product, its construction unified
by a thick coat of flesh-colored gloss. Crude details could be found:
thick steel plate cut for the medieval door mechanism lay raw and
unfinished; gouging marks left from the cutting torch were proud and
serrated.
The interior manifested
the scant material usage and economic means of construction that the
Compactor was victim to. It is blatant and unadulterated. The seams
between the folded steel plates that were so punctually welded on the
outside are here left raw and incomplete. Here, slag from the workers
cutting torch forms oxidized deposits, hanging down around the
circumferences of inserted hose ports, solidified on the axis of
exact gravity.
One soon finds out what
this thing really is: a folded steel box. Notice the gaps between the
plates and their folds and you are presented with the savage face of
production and its accompanying mentality of adhesion.
Plastic identity tags
from the steel mill are still evident in places, partially burnt from
the head of a MIG welding plant. Scored in engineer’s chalk by
a worker, the manufacture’s name reads “Marathon”.
It is still visible. These fragments of industrial process not only
uncover the nature of construction, but raise questions about the
cultural value of this structure, or the lack of it. Despite the
importance of this object, its articulation with what society
excretes, even the workers who made it apparently disregarded before
its completion. Around the rim of the octagonal entrance the exterior
gloss paint terminates, fading into a dull rust. The paint sprayer
stopped painting when they encountered the inside. No one will (ever)
see this.
In Allan Sekula's Fish
story we encounter further residue of industrial processes from
workers in the Korean ship- building industry.
Launched in 1984, the
Sea-Land Quality was one of the first ships built at the Daewoo
Shipyard on the island of Keojo off the south east coast of South
Korea, one of the series of "econships" commissioned by the
now-defunct United States Lines of Malcom Mclean, the trucking
executive who initiated containerized cargo movement in 1956. These
were the biggest container ships ever built to date, deliberately
slow: exercises in the economies of scale, cheap construction, and
conservative fuel use.
When the American crew
picked up the first of these ships from the Daewoo dockyard,
completed the sea trials, and began the voyage back across the
pacific, they discovered in the nooks and crannies of the new ship a
curious inventory of discarded tools used in the building of the
vessel: crude hammers made by welding a heavy bolt onto the end of a
length of pipe, wrenches cut roughly by torch from scraps of deck
plate. Awed by this evidence of improvisatory iron-age approach to
ship building, which corresponded to their earlier impressions of the
often-lethal brutality of Korean industrial methods they gathered the
tools into a small display in the crew's lounge, christening it "The
Korean Workers Museum." (Allan Sekula)1
The order
With the advent of modern
communication networks, almost anything has been made possible, even
immediate dispatch and relocation of a space, physical matter and
manpower. This work embodies and facilitates the notion of the “Hire”
as a powerful method of commanding, arranging and orchestrating.
The activity of the Hire
can be chiefly attributed to the construction industry, the entire
mechanism of which is a set of temporal components, operated by a
dispensable workforce. As a method of work, construction hire has
been further defined with the advent of the “Hire Shop”:
an international chain of plant hire outlets that provide temporary
workforces with even more temporary tools. The systemic disposability
of contemporary economic relations is interrogated in Michael Landy’s
important work, Scrapheap Services.
Landy's installations,
videos and drawings create an artificial world that reminds us of
some of the more sinister aspects of the society in which we live and
our complicity in sustaining its dehumanizing values. Scrapheap
Services, his best-known large-scale installation, first introduced
us to the fictitious cleaning company which offered its services to a
“prosperous society [which] depends upon a minority of people
being discarded.” (2) The British Art Show
The ease with which I
obtained the industrial Compactor (one phone call), and the speed of
its subsequent delivery, is underlined by the ultimate facility of
its future removal and disposal. The initial transaction, an ordinary
citizen acquiring industrial equipment through a rapid delivery
system, creates a brief yet bizarre cross-cultural engagement. This
kind of equipment arrives at an early hour clearly associated with
the routine of the manual work force. A perpetual cycle of monotonous
regularity: early mornings and evenings fueled with the subsistence
exitance of inadequate pay cheques. For a single moment precipitated
by the exchange of this waste Compactor, we briefly encounter the
often invisible or virtual system of manual labour, meshing with its
regimen across the arrival, foundational function and departure of
this apparatus.
When and if industry
recalls the Compactor through excessive waste generation, my activity
and the physical presence of the Compactor will be devoured
accordingly. The Compactor not only arrived to pose the possibility
of the implosion of artistic space, but to present an object of
deterrence. The removal of my practice leads to the ultimate
implosion of the White Cube. Here in this vacuum of post-artistic and
cubic space we can find room to maneuver again. This space of
physical aftermath ultimately defines a not only a sculptural notion
but effect.
The notion of the "Hire"
is further informed by a technology and a subculture that has learned
how to abuse it. Contemporary digital youth culture has in part
replaced the act of financial transaction for media with the endless
opportunity to download from digital networks at no charge. For this
culture, the downloading and massing of virtual objects, be it
ripped-off movie clips, cracked software or mp3s, has grown to such
proportions, that it has emerged as a primary method not only of
media retrieval and consumption, but of informational exchange.
Media technology has now
reached the plateau of the digital stream. Here users tap into a data
feed—whether music or video or News—in which they find
themselves unable to copy or own the data, encoded for viewing only
for specific amount of time. By virtue of its implicit
functionalities and potential for occupancy, the Compactor poses some
of these questions. Why is it that I—that no one—is able
to own waste systems objects.
To hire, or stream is
perhaps one step further than the “ready-made,” which
ultimately one might own, but never “make”. Once the task
of “hiring” or “streaming” is complete, the
bulk of material is retrieved, leaving only a light residue of the
activity behind. Such lightness is opposed to the weighty artistic
endeavor of craft or “making,” often a formally intense,
an indulgently labour intensive process. Hiring, downloading and
streaming combine to form the ultimate statement of efficiency. This
not only raises interesting questions about authorship and ownership,
but engenders the almost total removal and further dismantling of
skills.
The Data
Inside the Compactor, the
viewer encounters a repository of ideas, equipment and supportive
reference material. This information has a particular presentational
form: it is loosely taped, jammed, tied and magnetized to the
Compactors rusted surfaces. The scraps of paper form a temporal
surface, a pseudo-organic cladding that migrates through different
assemblages.
The data, some of which
takes the form of proposals, is intended as an aid to navigate the
mind of the viewer on a journey of electro-mechanical absurdity,
commencing with the feasible and terminating in figures of the
impossible or incomprehensible. The misuse of computer-aided design
provides for the efficient delivery of this perceptual itinerary.
Like their surroundings, all of the drawings in the Compactor are
actual products derived from a process of scouring the Internet,
harvesting blue prints stored in the depths of manufactures home
pages. Once obtained this technical data is quickly converted, each
vector transcribed through import to export. Upon command each model
is inserted, scaled and positioned limited only by the speed with
which I can relocate them.
The content horizon for
these projects is the subversion of containerization. The development
of a one hundred and ten kilowatt autonomous sound weapon is
presented in a large-scale format. Through its rigorous play and
ultimate abuse of conventional schematic techniques, the project
grows from a single solid object into a vast array of divergent
impossibilities. There will be a kind of climax in the final release
of sound energy—a single parabolic horn speaker eight stories
high, made possible through the simple selection of virtual
products-standard containers. But this only builds a metaphor that
questions the desire of the consumer and the constructive
capabilities of industrial manufacturing.
At present these actions
have occupied three different areas of the vessel. Where the paper
ends, the bundling of electrical cables, left hanging and
unadulterated, begins. The cables provide not only a dynamic
punctuation within the space, defying and intersecting the flatness
of the paper, but also resources for potential visitors and
happenings. Unlimited Internet, cable television, Internet radio and
electricity are piped into the space. At no cost are alterations made
to this structure during the duration of its visit. On the floor the
continuous stream of Internet radio can be heard. Operating twenty
four hours a day seven days a week, controlled by users online. In
the far corner a Web-cam streams in real time the activities within,
replayed in miniature on an LCD screen.
These cables pass freely
through a two inch plug hole. Upon delivery this was fused so hard
shut that only the torque generated by a four foot pipe as extension
bar provided adequate force to break the seal that had formed. This
same stone-age principal used had also grounded the container from
its carriage: leverage. Undoubtedly the massiveness of this object
commands the tools that service and operate it.
The bold insertion of the
Compactor within a resident art community and public thorough-fare,
provides an assertive physical presence that is offset by the more
“delicate” fragments of residue that accumulate in and
under its hull. The floor of the Compactor has not been cleansed of
micro debris. Passersby might observe the hulking form, make an
approach, and on closer inspection find themselves able to explore
the happenings yielded by the Compactor. Particles of various
substances are brought into the space by visitors. Shards of glass,
polystyrene, popcorn and ear plugs accumulate and shift within the
vessel’s cavernous form. These fragments can be heard subtly
crunching beneath the movement of feet. The Compactor responds with a
metallurgical echo that refracts and reverberates every single
action. This accumulation of this noise is subdivided as trampling
reduces the size of each particle.
In contrast to the micro
debris found on the interior the Compactor has a curious ability at
commanding other large objects. Through its duration larger debris
have gravitated to its perimeter. The balance that informs this
depository contrasts, starkly, with the rigid permanence of the
surrounding steel structure. The fluxes of activities within the
Compactor will ultimately be framed by its potential function:
collection, compression and imminent removal. The object and site
will be purged of all content.
During it relocation, the
Compactor acts as a particular operational apparatus: it is part
think tank, part exhibition space and partly a sculptural entity. It
emerges as an apparatus that simultaneously brandishes its formal
exterior as an object, and shelters a specific interior volume. Such
meshing of object, space and function is an integral strategy in the
deconstruction and eventual crisis not only of my practice but of the
White Cube itself. Encompassing and subject to cycle of perpetually
changing contents, the cube is decimated by the carnage of what it
subtends.
During its one-month
visit, the Compactor will break up and dissolve the tedious
conventions of the gallery. It will explode the concept and practice
of the “private view,” for the entrance to the Compactor
is always open, free for parties to enter and exit, and parties to
form. Except when actually engaged in its defining process of
compaction, the Compactor, will, in fact, always be left open, long
after it has departed from this particular use and site. Scraps of
our duration left within the object may endure in the rusty skin; or
they may not. The boundaries and limits of the work are not only
fluid, but unknowable.
1
Sekula Allan, Fish Story, Published Witte de with, Center for
contemporary Art, Rotterdam, 1996
2 Michael Landy, The
British Art Show 5,
http://www.britartshow.org.uk/artists/michael_landy.html